[ofa-general] Re: files preamble

[Ted H. Kim]

Or,

I am not responding directly to Arkady's question, but
aren't there some files with other licenses attached?

For example, it appears addr.c, cma.c, ib_addr.h, rdma_cm.h
and rdma_cm_ib.h -- all have the "Common Public License 1.0"
mentioned.

Are these special exceptions?
Or were they just overlooked?
Or is the idea of ONLY BSD and GPLv2 not a strict rule?

-ted


Or Gerlitz wrote:
> Kanevsky, Arkady wrote:
>> I noticed that all files in the preambule states that the file can be 
>> taken under GNU GPLv2 or
>> OpenIB BSD licence.
>> Should not it state OpenFabrics instead?
> My understanding is that when ofa was founded it was decided to go on 
> this --specific-- dual license, what reasoning you see to change that?
> 
> Or.


-- 
Ted H. Kim
Sun Microsystems, Inc.                  ted.kim at sun.com
222 North Sepulveda Blvd., 10th Floor   (310) 341-1116
El Segundo, CA  90245                   (310) 341-1120 FAX