[ofa-general] Re: linux-next: infiniband merge conflicts
Roland Dreier
rdreier at cisco.com
Mon Mar 31 04:56:21 PDT 2008
> Today's linux-next merge of the infiniband tree produced conflicts in
> drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c and drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c. The
> conflicts were against Al Viro's patch "trivial endianness annotations:
> infiniband core" (Linus' commit id
> 1b90c137cc2a0e9b813a8ae316827c493c664146). They are reasonably trivial.
OK, I've rebased my tree on top of Linus's current tree and fixed up
the conflicts.
I do wonder why endianness annotations are being merged post -rc7. If
anyone had sent them to me I would have waited for the 2.6.26 merge
window to send them to Linus. Which also leads to the question of why
these patches, which are a subset of the annotations I've had sitting
in my tree (and in -next) for quite a while, were so urgent that they
had to bypass my tree...
Oh well, water under the bridge. As you said the conflicts were
trivial so it's not a big deal to fix them up.
- R.
More information about the general
mailing list