[ofa-general] Re: [PATCH] saquery: --smkey command line option

[Sasha Khapyorsky]

On 04:33 Tue 27 May     , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> > 
> > Maybe yes, but could you be more specific? Store SMKey in read-only
> > file on a client side?
> 
> Treat smkey as su treats password rather than a command line parameter
> is another alternative.

Ok, let's do it as '--smkey X' and then saquery will ask for a value,
just like su does. Good?

> > I'm not proposing to expose SM_Key, just added such option where this
> > key could be specified.
> 
> How is that not exposing it ?

Because (1) and (2) below.

Sasha

> 
> -- Hal
> 
> >  So: 1) this is *optional*, 2) there is no
> > suggestions about how the right value should be determined.
> > 
> > Sasha
>