[ofa-general] OpenSM?

[Al Chu]

Hey Yevgeny,

> Did ftree fail to digest the topology? 

For the current OpenSM, on atleast one cluster, yes.  I've been meaning
to look into it.  Just haven't gotten to it yet.

There is some legacy too. Earlier ftree's weren't able to handle a
number of corner cases, so updn was used instead (and now is still
used).

> Or perhaps that you need LMC>0, which ftree doesn't support?

This too.

Al

On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 09:24 +0300, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
> Ira,
> 
> Ira Weiny wrote:
> > 
> > We run with the up/down algorithm, ftree has not panned out for us yet.
> 
> Can you elaborate on that?
> Did ftree fail to digest the topology? Or did it do a lousy job configuring
> the subnet? Or perhaps the you need LMC>0, which ftree doesn't support?
> 
> -- Yevgeny
> 
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> general at lists.openfabrics.org
> http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
> 
> To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
-- 
Albert Chu
chu11 at llnl.gov
925-422-5311
Computer Scientist
High Performance Systems Division
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory