[ofa-general] Re: [PATCHv2] management: Support separate SA and SM keys as clarified in IBA 1.2.1

[Hal Rosenstock]

On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 17:11 +0300, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> On 06:22 Thu 29 May     , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> > management: Support separate SA and SM keys as clarified in IBA 1.2.1
> > 
> > v2 is just a rebase to latest tree
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock <hal at xsigo.com> 
> 
> Applied. Thanks.
> 
> Host order default value is obviously wrong thing 

But it's compatible with what is there now so doesn't require a change
to saquery except in the PPC case as you noted.

> (like just OSM_DEFAULT_SM_KEY which is not resolved yet).

> I think I will change it to something like:
> 
> #define OSM_DEFAULT_SA_KEY OSM_DEFAULT_SM_KEY

Depends on how default SM key finally settles out as to whether it's
better to do it this way. I agree if we started with a clean slate this
would be the way to do it.

-- Hal

> Sasha
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> general at lists.openfabrics.org
> http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
> 
> To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general