[ofa-general] Re: [PATCHv3] OpenSM/osm_sa_mcmember_record.c: Collapse all scopes when consolidating IPv6 SNM
Sasha Khapyorsky
sashak at voltaire.com
Sat May 31 08:37:30 PDT 2008
Hi Hal,
I agree about idea. But patch itself seems to not be against main stream
(or any known published branch). Comments are below.
On 13:22 Fri 30 May , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> OpenSM/osm_sa_mcmember_record.c: In __search_mgrp_by_mgid, collapse all
> scopes when consolidating IPv6 SNM
>
> v2 compares masked prefixes rather than actual prefix in MCMemberRecord MGID and MGRP
> v1 had a minor comment change
>
> Patch is cumulative on minor improvement patch to this file
>
> Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock <hal at xsigo.com>
>
> --- opensm/osm_sa_mcmember_record.c.1 2008-05-30 03:58:01.129544000 -0700
> +++ opensm/osm_sa_mcmember_record.c 2008-05-30 13:13:59.344954000 -0700
Please next time generate a diff at least at one level above (but better
is as usual - at git tree level + 1).
> @@ -1083,19 +1083,21 @@
>
> if (sa->p_subn->opt.consolidate_ipv6_snm_req) {
> /* Special Case IPv6 Solicited Node Multicast (SNM) addresses */
> - /* 0xff12601bXXXX0000 : 0x00000001ffYYYYYY */
> - /* Where XXXX is the P_Key and
> + /* 0xff1Z601bXXXX0000 : 0x00000001ffYYYYYY */
> + /* Where Z is the scope, XXXX is the P_Key, and
> * YYYYYY is the last 24 bits of the port guid */
> -#define PREFIX_MASK (0xff10601b00000000ULL)
There I have 0xff12601b00000000ULL value (and likely it is what you
wanted to fix :)).
> +#define PREFIX_MASK (0xff10ffff00000000ULL)
> +#define PREFIX_SIGNATURE (0xff10601b00000000ULL)
> #define INT_ID_MASK (0x00000001ff000000ULL)
> uint64_t g_prefix = cl_ntoh64(p_mgrp->mcmember_rec.mgid.unicast.prefix);
> uint64_t g_interface_id = cl_ntoh64(p_mgrp->mcmember_rec.mgid.unicast.interface_id);
> uint64_t rcv_prefix = cl_ntoh64(p_recvd_mgid->unicast.prefix);
> uint64_t rcv_interface_id = cl_ntoh64(p_recvd_mgid->unicast.interface_id);
>
> - if ((rcv_prefix & PREFIX_MASK) == PREFIX_MASK &&
> + if ((rcv_prefix & PREFIX_MASK) == PREFIX_SIGNATURE &&
If you are changing PREFIX_MASK to 0xff10601b00000000ULL, why
PREFIX_SIGNATURE is needed? Am I missing something?
Sasha
> (rcv_interface_id & INT_ID_MASK) == INT_ID_MASK &&
> - g_prefix == rcv_prefix &&
> + (g_prefix & PREFIX_MASK) ==
> + (rcv_prefix && PREFIX_MASK) &&
> (g_interface_id & INT_ID_MASK) ==
> (rcv_interface_id & INT_ID_MASK)) {
> OSM_LOG(sa->p_log, OSM_LOG_INFO,
>
>
More information about the general
mailing list