[ofa-general] [infiniband-diags] specify -l(loop_ports) in ibclearerrors and ibclearcounters

Hal Rosenstock hal.rosenstock at gmail.com
Thu Oct 9 10:13:48 PDT 2008


On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Ira Weiny <weiny2 at llnl.gov> wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 09:17:39 -0700
> Al Chu <chu11 at llnl.gov> wrote:
>
>> Hey Hal,
>>
>> On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 21:54 -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>> > Hi Al,
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 8:40 PM, Al Chu <chu11 at llnl.gov> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Note that these scripts specify -R (reset only) for perfquery, so there
>> > > aren't any issues with multiple perfquery outputs that may need to be
>> > > parsed multiple times/differently.
>> >
>> > But this takes many more resets to work, right ? Why not have loop
>> > ports (for reset) only do this is all ports is not supported ?
>>
>> Do you mean remove the --loop_ports option and loop the ports by default
>> even if AllPortSelect isn't supported?
>>
>> I suppose that'd be fine.  The reason I added an option was I just
>> didn't want to change default behavior.  But if everyone is happy just
>> making it happen by default, I'm ok with that as well.
>>
>
> I vote yes.  Have the loop ports happen "under the covers" if the user
> specifies '-a' this includes summing the values just like AllPortSelect would
> in the switch.  If the user specifies "0xff" I think that would be a good way
> to request specific functionality and (as per Al's other email) return an error
> if AllPortSelect is not supported.

I think this neglects whether a single response to the user is
intended, This would cause one response per port on a read.

-- Hal

> Ira
>
>



More information about the general mailing list