[ofa-general] [PATCH] opensm/osm_ucast_lash: fix buffer overflow
Robert Pearson
rpearson at systemfabricworks.com
Tue Oct 14 06:58:36 PDT 2008
Hi Sasha,
The idea would be to let lash complete the analysis and report how many VLs
would be required even if that is more than the number available. It would
require allocating more memory than it does now. In my case I did this by
hacking opensm to set the number of VLs to a large number (64) and letting
it run.
Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: Sasha Khapyorsky [mailto:sashak at voltaire.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 3:22 AM
To: Hal Rosenstock
Cc: Robert Pearson; OpenIB
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] [PATCH] opensm/osm_ucast_lash: fix buffer
overflow
On 12:53 Mon 13 Oct , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>
> > Is there a way to have lash report the number of VLs required
independent of
> > the type of switch used?
>
> Not sure what you mean by this.
May be it is how to know how many VLs does LASH require for a given
topology?
Sasha
More information about the general
mailing list