[ofa-general] Re: 1.5 roadmap

[Or Gerlitz]

On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 1:42 AM, Woodruff, Robert J <robert.j.woodruff at intel.com>
> Also, I think that what we agreed to was that code should be submitted and reviewed
> and queued for upstream inclusion prior to being accepted[...] We did not say that it
> had to be in a released kernel [...] but if it were queued in Roland's tree for a future
> kernel, then allow it.

Woody,

Except for one or two exceptions which I'm not sure about for the most
case, we aren't talking on inclusion of code which is queued for merge
vs already merged but rather on massive inclusion of non reviewed
code.

Or.