***SPAM*** Re: [ofa-general] ***SPAM*** Re: [PATCHv3] libibmad/rpc.c: Handle redirection status

[Sasha Khapyorsky]

On 10:12 Tue 14 Apr     , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> >
> > Do you know any example where this will not work properly? I don't.
> 
> Not currently but it's a spec compliance issue.

I don't think we want to slow down fast path without a real needs.

> > The error status is printed originally, isn't it not sufficient?
> 
> IMO it's not sufficient as redirection is not an error.

It is handled as error in this patch, the only message is different.

> > If not
> > what about adding generic function which prints know error codes as
> > string instead of handling some values separately?
> 
> That's doable but a separate proposition IMO.

This is better than doing duplicated status parsing flows.

Sasha