[ofa-general] [PATCH] uDAPL v2: dapltest, adjust next port number for number of threads to avoid duplication

[arkady kanevsky]

Arlin,
did we encounter this issue at interop?
I do not recall seeing it.
For IB, does Wait period between assigning the same QP# handles it?
Thanks,
Arkady

On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 4:06 AM, Davis, Arlin R <arlin.r.davis at intel.com>wrote:

>
> To avoid duplicating port numbers between different tests, the next port
> number to use must increment based on the number of endpoints per thread *
> the number of threads.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Hefty <sean.hefty at intel.com>
> ---
>  test/dapltest/test/dapl_server.c |    3 +++
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/test/dapltest/test/dapl_server.c
> b/test/dapltest/test/dapl_server.c
> index d589e7b..4d386fe 100644
> --- a/test/dapltest/test/dapl_server.c
> +++ b/test/dapltest/test/dapl_server.c
> @@ -480,6 +480,9 @@ DT_cs_Server (Params_t * params_ptr)
>            case TRANSACTION_TEST:
>            {
>                /* create a thread to handle this pt_ptr; */
> +               ps_ptr->NextPortNumber +=
> +                       (pt_ptr->Params.u.Transaction_Cmd.eps_per_thread -
> 1) *
> +                       pt_ptr->Client_Info.total_threads;
>                DT_Tdep_PT_Debug (1,(phead,"%s: Creating Transaction Test
> Thread\n", module));
>                pt_ptr->thread = DT_Thread_Create (pt_ptr,
>                                           DT_Transaction_Test_Server,
> --
> 1.5.2.5
>
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> general at lists.openfabrics.org
> http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
>
> To unsubscribe, please visit
> http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>



-- 
Cheers,
Arkady Kanevsky
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20090419/e7be84d4/attachment.html>