[ofa-general] Re: New proposal for memory management

Jeff Squyres jsquyres at cisco.com
Thu Apr 30 12:56:21 PDT 2009


On Apr 30, 2009, at 3:21 PM, Tom Talpey wrote:

> Of course I agree. I am however questioning the goal of making this
> 100% transparent. To do so, both sides of the interface will need to
> behave in specific ways (e.g. no forking), and that can be very, very
> difficult to achieve.
>

There's no goal of making this 100% transparent.  Sure, that'd be nice  
(perhaps as a long-term goal), but that's not what I started this  
thread for.

We're not even trying to be lazy; MPI implementations have done a  
*lot* of work to make MPI function properly over OpenFabrics.  But as  
Brian said, we just need *something* that is safe and sane.  Right  
now, we don't have that.

-- 
Jeff Squyres
Cisco Systems




More information about the general mailing list