[ofa-general] Re: New proposal for memory management
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres at cisco.com
Thu Apr 30 12:56:21 PDT 2009
On Apr 30, 2009, at 3:21 PM, Tom Talpey wrote:
> Of course I agree. I am however questioning the goal of making this
> 100% transparent. To do so, both sides of the interface will need to
> behave in specific ways (e.g. no forking), and that can be very, very
> difficult to achieve.
>
There's no goal of making this 100% transparent. Sure, that'd be nice
(perhaps as a long-term goal), but that's not what I started this
thread for.
We're not even trying to be lazy; MPI implementations have done a
*lot* of work to make MPI function properly over OpenFabrics. But as
Brian said, we just need *something* that is safe and sane. Right
now, we don't have that.
--
Jeff Squyres
Cisco Systems
More information about the general
mailing list