[ofa-general] Re: [PATCH] opensm/osm_trap_rcv.c: Validate trap is 144 before checking for NodeDescription changed
Sasha Khapyorsky
sashak at voltaire.com
Wed Aug 5 12:04:42 PDT 2009
On 08:47 Tue 04 Aug , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock at gmail.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/opensm/opensm/osm_trap_rcv.c b/opensm/opensm/osm_trap_rcv.c
> index bf39926..925cb27 100644
> --- a/opensm/opensm/osm_trap_rcv.c
> +++ b/opensm/opensm/osm_trap_rcv.c
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> * Copyright (c) 2004-2008 Voltaire, Inc. All rights reserved.
> * Copyright (c) 2002-2006 Mellanox Technologies LTD. All rights reserved.
> * Copyright (c) 1996-2003 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
> + * Copyright (c) 2009 HNR Consulting. All rights reserved.
> *
> * This software is available to you under a choice of one of two
> * licenses. You may choose to be licensed under the terms of the GNU
> @@ -546,42 +547,47 @@ trap_rcv_process_request(IN osm_sm_t * sm,
> }
> }
>
> - /* Check for node description update. IB Spec v1.2.1 pg 823 */
> - if (p_ntci->data_details.ntc_144.local_changes & TRAP_144_MASK_OTHER_LOCAL_CHANGES &&
> - p_ntci->data_details.ntc_144.change_flgs & TRAP_144_MASK_NODE_DESCRIPTION_CHANGE) {
> - OSM_LOG(sm->p_log, OSM_LOG_INFO, "Trap 144 Node description update\n");
> -
> - if (p_physp) {
> - CL_PLOCK_ACQUIRE(sm->p_lock);
> - osm_req_get_node_desc(sm, p_physp);
> - CL_PLOCK_RELEASE(sm->p_lock);
> - } else {
> - OSM_LOG(sm->p_log, OSM_LOG_ERROR,
> - "ERR 3812: No physical port found for "
> - "trap 144: \"node description update\"\n");
> + if (ib_notice_is_generic(p_ntci)) {
> + /* Check for node description update. IB Spec v1.2.1 pg 823 */
> + if (cl_ntoh16(p_ntci->g_or_v.generic.trap_num) == 144) {
> + if (p_ntci->data_details.ntc_144.local_changes & TRAP_144_MASK_OTHER_LOCAL_CHANGES &&
> + p_ntci->data_details.ntc_144.change_flgs & TRAP_144_MASK_NODE_DESCRIPTION_CHANGE) {
> + OSM_LOG(sm->p_log, OSM_LOG_INFO,
> + "Trap 144 Node description update\n");
> +
> + if (p_physp) {
> + CL_PLOCK_ACQUIRE(sm->p_lock);
> + osm_req_get_node_desc(sm, p_physp);
> + CL_PLOCK_RELEASE(sm->p_lock);
> + } else
> + OSM_LOG(sm->p_log, OSM_LOG_ERROR,
> + "ERR 3812: No physical port found for "
> + "trap 144: \"node description update\"\n");
> + }
> }
> - }
>
> - /* do a sweep if we received a trap */
> - if (sm->p_subn->opt.sweep_on_trap) {
> - /* if this is trap number 128 or run_heavy_sweep is TRUE -
> - update the force_heavy_sweep flag of the subnet.
> - Sweep also on traps 144/145 - these traps signal a change of
> - certain port capabilities/system image guid.
> - TODO: In the future this can be changed to just getting
> - PortInfo on this port instead of sweeping the entire subnet. */
> - if (ib_notice_is_generic(p_ntci) &&
> - (cl_ntoh16(p_ntci->g_or_v.generic.trap_num) == 128 ||
> - cl_ntoh16(p_ntci->g_or_v.generic.trap_num) == 144 ||
> - cl_ntoh16(p_ntci->g_or_v.generic.trap_num) == 145 ||
> - run_heavy_sweep)) {
> - OSM_LOG(sm->p_log, OSM_LOG_VERBOSE,
> - "Forcing heavy sweep. Received trap:%u\n",
> - cl_ntoh16(p_ntci->g_or_v.generic.trap_num));
> + /* do a sweep if we received a trap */
> + if (sm->p_subn->opt.sweep_on_trap) {
> + /* if this is trap number 128 or run_heavy_sweep is
> + TRUE - update the force_heavy_sweep flag of the
> + subnet. Also, sweep also on traps 144/145 -
> + these traps signal a change of certain port
> + capabilities/system image guid.
> + TODO: In the future this can be changed to just
> + getting PortInfo on this port instead of sweeping
> + the entire subnet. */
> + if (cl_ntoh16(p_ntci->g_or_v.generic.trap_num) == 128 ||
> + cl_ntoh16(p_ntci->g_or_v.generic.trap_num) == 144 ||
> + cl_ntoh16(p_ntci->g_or_v.generic.trap_num) == 145 ||
> + run_heavy_sweep) {
> + OSM_LOG(sm->p_log, OSM_LOG_VERBOSE,
> + "Forcing heavy sweep. Received trap:%u\n",
> + cl_ntoh16(p_ntci->g_or_v.generic.trap_num));
>
> - sm->p_subn->force_heavy_sweep = TRUE;
> + sm->p_subn->force_heavy_sweep = TRUE;
> + }
> + osm_sm_signal(sm, OSM_SIGNAL_SWEEP);
> }
> - osm_sm_signal(sm, OSM_SIGNAL_SWEEP);
Actually this disables sweep (light) on non generic traps. Was it desired
change? Could you see any potential issues with it?
Sasha
> }
>
> /* If we reached here due to trap 129/130/131 - do not need to do
>
More information about the general
mailing list