[ofa-general] Re: [PATCH] opensm/osm_ucast_file.c: Fix return status from do_ucast_file_load when file name is not provided

[Hal Rosenstock]

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Sasha Khapyorsky <sashak at voltaire.com>wrote:

> On 06:59 Wed 12 Aug     , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> >
> > Because it's broken request (no warning of nothing useful is going to be
> > done).
>
> There are warnings about unspecified files.


These messages are VERBOSE in log level so they're not normally seen. INFO
might be better.


>
>
> > Don't we try to fallback in broken scenarios ?
>
> It is not obvious in this case - for instance one may want to run OpenSM,
> to fetch LFT as template, modify them and reload by just adding '-U',
> etc..


dumping LFTs in case of no files doesn't make for a very good template to
start with.


> Anyway it is user's decision there.


Perhaps but we usually help with poor decisions.

-- Hal


>
> Sasha
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20090812/22402f42/attachment.html>