[ofa-general] Re: Kernel panic in IPoIB stability testing
Jack Morgenstein
jackm at dev.mellanox.co.il
Wed Feb 4 08:03:57 PST 2009
On Wednesday 04 February 2009 17:45, Moni Shoua wrote:
> Besides the locking issue that I hadn't think about yet what if we this fix looks the right thing to do.
> But what if we leave the path without freeing it even if path_rec_start() fails?
> This would leave a path which is not valid in path_list which is not forbidden state as
> I conclude (after all this is the state the function was called)
> In this way, I think that we don't have to worry about locks.
>
> and the code will look like this
>
> if (!path || !path->valid) {
> if (!path)
> path = path_rec_create(dev, phdr->hwaddr + 4);
> if (path) {
> /* put pseudoheader back on for next time */
> skb_push(skb, sizeof *phdr);
> __skb_queue_tail(&path->queue, skb);
>
> if (!path->query && path_rec_start(dev, path)) {
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
> - path_free(dev, path);
> return;
> } else
> __path_add(dev, path);
> } else {
> ++priv->stats.tx_dropped;
> dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
> }
>
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
> return;
> }
>
Still need some correction. If the path did not exist previously (i.e, !path = TRUE,
and, below, had_path = 0), then need to call path_free or we will have a leak.
Maybe the correct patch is:
path = __path_find(dev, phdr->hwaddr + 4);
if (!path || !path->valid) {
int had_path = 0;
if (!path)
path = path_rec_create(dev, phdr->hwaddr + 4);
else
had_path = 1;
if (path) {
/* put pseudoheader back on for next time */
skb_push(skb, sizeof *phdr);
__skb_queue_tail(&path->queue, skb);
if (!path->query && path_rec_start(dev, path)) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
if (!had_path)
path_free(dev, path);
return;
} else
__path_add(dev, path);
} else {
++dev->stats.tx_dropped;
dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
}
More information about the general
mailing list