[ofa-general] Re: [RFC] OpenSM vendor layer

[Sasha Khapyorsky]

On 10:27 Sat 07 Feb     , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> >> Is bypassing it's vendor layer acceptable for OpenSM
> >
> > Sure, so it is why I asked where and for what purpose do you need pkey
> > table and why is OpenSM vendor layer chosen there?
> >
> >> unless we are
> >> going to totally remove it and go straight to umad (which I'm not
> >> proposing) ?
> >
> > BTW, WinOF now has libibumad implemented too,
> 
> Yes, it seems pretty far along now.
> 
> > it could be an option to switch.
> 
> Could be but what about the other vendor layers ? Would we orphan those ?

Who needs this really, it is broken long time anyway.

Sasha