[ofa-general] Re: [PATCH] opensm/osm_ucast_ftree.c: Fixed bug on index port incrementation
Sasha Khapyorsky
sashak at voltaire.com
Mon Feb 9 06:41:35 PST 2009
Hi Nicolas,
On 08:01 Mon 09 Feb , Nicolas Morey Chaisemartin wrote:
> Here is an updated version of the patch including Yevgeni's feedback.
Could you provide more descriptive commit message? This text will be
stored in OpenSM change history and your current comment doesn't say a
lot.
If you need to place in patch message some text which should not enter
change log (such as details about differences against previous version
of the patch or any other) it should be placed after '---' below.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin
> <nicolas.morey-chaisemartin at ext.bull.net>
> ---
<some optional text unrelated to commit message>
Sasha
> opensm/opensm/osm_ucast_ftree.c | 39
> +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/opensm/opensm/osm_ucast_ftree.c b/opensm/opensm/osm_ucast_ftree.c
> index 68900d8..3ea61a1 100644
> --- a/opensm/opensm/osm_ucast_ftree.c
> +++ b/opensm/opensm/osm_ucast_ftree.c
> @@ -1914,7 +1914,7 @@ static void __osm_ftree_set_sw_fwd_table(IN cl_map_item_t * const p_map_item,
> * assign-up-going-port-by-descending-down to r-port node (recursion)
> */
>
> -static void
> +static boolean_t
> __osm_ftree_fabric_route_upgoing_by_going_down(IN ftree_fabric_t * p_ftree,
> IN ftree_sw_t * p_sw,
> IN ftree_sw_t * p_prev_sw,
> @@ -1932,18 +1932,14 @@ __osm_ftree_fabric_route_upgoing_by_going_down(IN ftree_fabric_t * p_ftree,
> uint16_t i;
> uint16_t j;
> uint16_t k;
> + boolean_t created_route = FALSE;
>
> /* we shouldn't enter here if both real_lid and main_path are false */
> CL_ASSERT(is_real_lid || is_main_path);
>
> /* if there is no down-going ports */
> if (p_sw->down_port_groups_num == 0)
> - return;
> -
> - /* promote the index that indicates which group should we
> - start with when going through all the downgoing groups */
> - p_sw->down_port_groups_idx =
> - (p_sw->down_port_groups_idx + 1) % p_sw->down_port_groups_num;
> + return FALSE;;
>
> /* foreach down-going port group (in indexing order) */
> i = p_sw->down_port_groups_idx;
> @@ -1952,9 +1948,12 @@ __osm_ftree_fabric_route_upgoing_by_going_down(IN ftree_fabric_t * p_ftree,
> p_group = p_sw->down_port_groups[i];
> i = (i + 1) % p_sw->down_port_groups_num;
>
> - /* Skip this port group unless it points to a switch */
> - if (p_group->remote_node_type != IB_NODE_TYPE_SWITCH)
> + /* If this port group doesn't point to a switch, mark
> + that the route was created and skip to the next group */
> + if (p_group->remote_node_type != IB_NODE_TYPE_SWITCH){
> + created_route = TRUE;
> continue;
> + }
>
> if (p_prev_sw
> && (p_group->remote_base_lid == p_prev_sw->base_lid)) {
> @@ -2073,16 +2072,24 @@ __osm_ftree_fabric_route_upgoing_by_going_down(IN ftree_fabric_t * p_ftree,
>
> /* Recursion step:
> Assign upgoing ports by stepping down, starting on REMOTE switch */
> - __osm_ftree_fabric_route_upgoing_by_going_down(p_ftree, p_remote_sw, /* remote switch - used as a route-upgoing alg. start point */
> - NULL, /* prev. position - NULL to mark that we went down and not up */
> - target_lid, /* LID that we're routing to */
> - target_rank, /* rank of the LID that we're routing to */
> - is_real_lid, /* whether the target LID is real or dummy */
> - is_main_path, /* whether this is path to HCA that should by tracked by counters */
> - highest_rank_in_route); /* highest visited point in the tree before going down */
> + created_route |= __osm_ftree_fabric_route_upgoing_by_going_down(p_ftree, p_remote_sw, /* remote switch - used as a route-upgoing alg. start point */
> + NULL, /* prev. position - NULL to mark that we went down and not up */
> + target_lid, /* LID that we're routing to */
> + target_rank, /* rank of the LID that we're routing to */
> + is_real_lid, /* whether the target LID is real or dummy */
> + is_main_path, /* whether this is path to HCA that should by tracked by counters */
> + highest_rank_in_route); /* highest visited point in the tree before going down */
> }
> /* done scanning all the down-going port groups */
>
> + /* if the route was created, promote the index that
> + indicates which group should we start with when
> + going through all the downgoing groups */
> + if (created_route)
> + p_sw->down_port_groups_idx =
> + (p_sw->down_port_groups_idx + 1) % p_sw->down_port_groups_num;
> +
> + return created_route;
> } /* __osm_ftree_fabric_route_upgoing_by_going_down() */
>
> /***************************************************/
>
More information about the general
mailing list