[ofa-general] Re: [ofw] Re: saquery & osm vendor IBAL - ca_names missing from osm_vendor_t ?

[Sasha Khapyorsky]

Hello Stan,

On 13:16 Mon 09 Feb     , Smith, Stan wrote:
> 
> My proposal for the Windows OpenSM code base is to add ca_names[UMAD_MAX_DEVICES][UMAD_CA_NAME_LEN] to OpenSM vendor-ibal definition of osm_vendor_t and a call to umad_get_cas_names() to populate the osm_vendor_t.ca_names struct for.
> 
> Comments?

Assuming WinOF already has libibumad implementation with preserved API
would it be reasonable to switch from vendor-ibal to vendor-ibumad in
WinOF?

Sasha