On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 7:41 AM, Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock at gmail.com> wrote: > so I'm thinking the tables need to be supplied by the underlying > vendor library (al, umad, ...). Do you concur ? If so, this can be supported as part of umad or better yet as part of OpenSM umad vendor with no umad changes. -- Hal