[ofa-general] [PATCH] libibmad: remove functions which use pthread

[Sasha Khapyorsky]

On 21:18 Tue 17 Feb     , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Sasha Khapyorsky <sashak at voltaire.com> wrote:
> > On 09:52 Mon 16 Feb     , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> >>
> >> A first step would be removing the portid as static. If so, portid
> >> would need to be a supplied parameter to various mad routines and the
> >> existing ones relying on madrpc_portid would be deprecated. Does this
> >> make sense to do ?
> >
> > A first step would be converting all clients and internal usage in
> > libibmad (if any) to use a newer interface. If this will go smoothly
> > and things will not become overcomlicated, we could move forward -
> > to deprecate old interface... etc.. Nothing new.
> 
> Why nothing new ? I think there are higher level support functions
> which need to support the newer API.

Meant "nothing new" in API replace/upgrade procedure.

Sasha