[ofa-general] Re: [PATCH] RDMA/cxgb3: logical-/bit-or confusion?
Roland Dreier
rdreier at cisco.com
Wed Feb 18 10:41:48 PST 2009
> > - ep->mpa_attr.crc_enabled = (mpa->flags & MPA_CRC) | crc_enabled ? 1 : 0;
> > + ep->mpa_attr.crc_enabled = (mpa->flags & MPA_CRC) || crc_enabled ? 1 : 0;
I don't seem to have the original email for some reason.
Has anyone looked at which way generates better/smaller code? Since ||
requires short-circuit evaluation it might be better to leave it as |.
But maybe it's not worth being so tricky.
If someone can resend the patch to me I'm happy to apply it.
- R.
More information about the general
mailing list