[ofa-general] Bandwidth of performance with multirail IB
Jie Cai
Jie.Cai at cs.anu.edu.au
Wed Mar 4 16:40:01 PST 2009
Davis, Arlin R wrote:
>
> Jie,
>
>
>> A question on implementation multi-rail with uDAPL connections.
>>
>> What I did is open 2 IAs (corresponding to the 2 ports on
>> HCAs) on each
>> node.
>> Then create one EP for each IA, and connect those EPs to the
>> corresponding
>> EP at other node.
>>
>> Then data been transferred via both EP-connections.
>>
>
> Did you verify data flow is across independent HCA channels
> using perfquery?
>
I have using perfquery to verified that data has been transmit
through both channel. The ourput for perfquery is:
############# Before data transfer: #############
# Port counters: Lid 8 port 1
PortSelect:......................1
CounterSelect:...................0x0000
LinkDowned:......................2
XmtDiscards:.....................39
XmtData:.........................4294967295
RcvData:.........................20456971
XmtPkts:.........................112151685
RcvPkts:.........................2372783
# Port counters: Lid 9 port 2
PortSelect:......................2
CounterSelect:...................0x0000
LinkDowned:......................1
XmtDiscards:.....................21
XmtData:.........................4294967295
RcvData:.........................7123011
XmtPkts:.........................62927413
RcvPkts:.........................896106
############# After data transfer: #############
# Port counters: Lid 8 port 1
PortSelect:......................1
CounterSelect:...................0x0000
LinkDowned:......................2
XmtDiscards:.....................39
XmtData:.........................4294967295
RcvData:.........................20457865
XmtPkts:.........................112168095
RcvPkts:.........................2372882
# Port counters: Lid 9 port 2
PortSelect:......................2
CounterSelect:...................0x0000
LinkDowned:......................1
XmtDiscards:.....................21
XmtData:.........................4294967295
RcvData:.........................7123912
XmtPkts:.........................62943824
RcvPkts:.........................896206
Difference in XmtPkts of port1 is 16410, and the difference for port 2
is 16411.
Does this suggest that around similar size of data has been transfered
through both rails?
>
>> I have been notice that there's a MULTIPATH connection flag for dapl,
>> but I did
>> not use it. What's the use of it?
>>
>
> Multipath is not supported at this time.
>
> I will roll up a uDAPL test and see if I can verify performance.
>
> -arlin
>
>
More information about the general
mailing list