[ofa-general] RE: [PATCH] add c99 definitions within the ib_mad_f structure

[Davis, Arlin R]

>Sean Hefty wrote:
>> this knowingly breaks the windows build...
>> 
>So what do you suggest?
>Ira replied that he has no problems with it.
>

What happened? I thought we were all in agreement when we advocated removal of c99 definitions. I think this is a small price to pay for mantainability and portability across OS'es. 

Look at the state of OpenSM. The Windows version is so outdated that it is virtually unusable and is very limited in feature's as compared to OFED versions. Is this what we want for these components?