[ofa-general] Patch for libvendor incompatibility with QLogic SM
Mike Heinz
michael.heinz at qlogic.com
Mon May 4 06:37:51 PDT 2009
Thanks for the quick response, Hal. Will that branch be folded into 1.5?
--
Michael Heinz
Principal Engineer, Qlogic Corporation
King of Prussia, Pennsylvania
-----Original Message-----
From: Hal Rosenstock [mailto:hal.rosenstock at gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 9:37 AM
To: Mike Heinz
Cc: general at lists.openfabrics.org; Bob Jaworski; Todd Rimmer
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Patch for libvendor incompatibility with QLogic SM
On 5/4/09, Mike Heinz <michael.heinz at qlogic.com> wrote:
> Hey, all -
>
> I submitted this patch back in December; there's some question on my end
> about whether or not it was accepted for the next release of OFED.
>
> Can anyone set me straight?
It is commit fa905120f9971bf1601cc3fed4a7900fe9814892 on the master.
It depends on what you mean by next release of OFED as to whether it
will be there. If you mean OFED 1.4.1, then the answer appears to be
not currently. See opensm-3.2 branch.
-- Hal
> --
> Michael Heinz
> Principal Engineer, Qlogic Corporation
> King of Prussia, Pennsylvania
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Heinz
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 4:05 PM
> To: 'Hal Rosenstock'
> Cc: general at lists.openfabrics.org
> Subject: RE: [ofa-general] Patch for libvendor incompatibility with QLogic
> SM
>
> No problem. I figured it had to be something like that.
>
>
> --
> Michael Heinz
> Principal Engineer, Qlogic Corporation
> King of Prussia, Pennsylvania
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hal Rosenstock [mailto:hal.rosenstock at gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 4:02 PM
> To: Mike Heinz
> Cc: general at lists.openfabrics.org
> Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Patch for libvendor incompatibility with QLogic
> SM
>
> Mike,
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Mike Heinz <michael.heinz at qlogic.com>
> wrote:
>> Hal,
>>
>> You've got me really confused now - there are only two cases that need
>> changing, OSMV_QUERY_PATH_REC_BY_GIDS and
>> OSMV_QUERY_PATH_REC_BY_PORT_GUIDS; OSMV_QUERY_PATH_REC_BY_LIDS does *not*
>> need to be changed because it uses the GET method. Thus, this should be
>> the correct patch. (I'm re-including it for clarity).
>
> The below looks right to me. The previous one with osm_vendor_mlx_sa.c was
> truncated somehow in my gmail and appeared to only have 1 of the 2 cases and
> I didn't look at the attachment. Sorry for the confusion.
>
> -- Hal
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Heinz <mheinz at qlogic.com>
>> --------------------------------
>> --- osm_vendor_ibumad_sa.c.orig 2008-10-20 01:00:09.000000000 -0400
>> +++ osm_vendor_ibumad_sa.c 2008-12-18 14:50:49.000000000 -0500
>> @@ -615,7 +615,8 @@
>> sa_mad_data.attr_offset =
>> ib_get_attr_offset(sizeof(ib_path_rec_t));
>> sa_mad_data.comp_mask =
>> - (IB_PR_COMPMASK_DGID | IB_PR_COMPMASK_SGID);
>> + (IB_PR_COMPMASK_DGID | IB_PR_COMPMASK_SGID |
>> IB_PR_COMPMASK_NUMBPATH);
>> + path_rec.num_path = 0x7f;
>> sa_mad_data.p_attr = &path_rec;
>> ib_gid_set_default(&path_rec.dgid,
>> ((osmv_guid_pair_t *) (p_query_req->
>> @@ -634,7 +635,8 @@
>> sa_mad_data.attr_offset =
>> ib_get_attr_offset(sizeof(ib_path_rec_t));
>> sa_mad_data.comp_mask =
>> - (IB_PR_COMPMASK_DGID | IB_PR_COMPMASK_SGID);
>> + (IB_PR_COMPMASK_DGID | IB_PR_COMPMASK_SGID |
>> IB_PR_COMPMASK_NUMBPATH);
>> + path_rec.num_path = 0x7f;
>> sa_mad_data.p_attr = &path_rec;
>> memcpy(&path_rec.dgid,
>> &((osmv_gid_pair_t *)
>> (p_query_req->p_query_input))->
>> --- osm_vendor_mlx_sa.c.orig 2008-10-20 01:00:09.000000000 -0400
>> +++ osm_vendor_mlx_sa.c 2008-12-18 14:51:34.000000000 -0500
>> @@ -743,7 +743,8 @@
>> sa_mad_data.attr_offset =
>> ib_get_attr_offset(sizeof(ib_path_rec_t));
>> sa_mad_data.comp_mask =
>> - (IB_PR_COMPMASK_DGID | IB_PR_COMPMASK_SGID);
>> + (IB_PR_COMPMASK_DGID | IB_PR_COMPMASK_SGID |
>> IB_PR_COMPMASK_NUMBPATH);
>> + path_rec.num_path = 0x7f;
>> sa_mad_data.p_attr = &path_rec;
>> ib_gid_set_default(&path_rec.dgid,
>> ((osmv_guid_pair_t *) (p_query_req->
>> @@ -763,7 +764,8 @@
>> sa_mad_data.attr_offset =
>> ib_get_attr_offset(sizeof(ib_path_rec_t));
>> sa_mad_data.comp_mask =
>> - (IB_PR_COMPMASK_DGID | IB_PR_COMPMASK_SGID);
>> + (IB_PR_COMPMASK_DGID | IB_PR_COMPMASK_SGID |
>> IB_PR_COMPMASK_NUMBPATH);
>> + path_rec.num_path = 0x7f;
>> sa_mad_data.p_attr = &path_rec;
>> memcpy(&path_rec.dgid,
>> &((osmv_gid_pair_t *)
>> (p_query_req->p_query_input))->
>>
>> --
>> Michael Heinz
>> Principal Engineer, Qlogic Corporation King of Prussia, Pennsylvania
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Hal Rosenstock [mailto:hal.rosenstock at gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 3:32 PM
>> To: Mike Heinz
>> Cc: general at lists.openfabrics.org
>> Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Patch for libvendor incompatibility with
>> QLogic SM
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Mike Heinz <michael.heinz at qlogic.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Right and it wouldn't need num_paths either (as get assumes 1) so I
>>>> don't think the changes for OSMV_QUERY_PATH_REC_BY_LIDS in both these
>>>> patches are needed.
>>>
>>> Sorry if I was unclear, the last patch submission neither sets the
>>> num_path field nor the attribute mask for OSMV_QUERY_PATH_REC_BY_LIDS
>>> queries.
>>
>> Right; I didn't see the updated patch was for both sa files. In the new
>> patch, one case was missed in terms of the needed change though unless I
>> missed that too...
>>
>
More information about the general
mailing list