[Ofa_boardplus] logo program discussion
Jim Ryan
jimdryan at gmail.com
Fri Sep 1 10:29:41 PDT 2017
Susan, thanks for the guidance. As I said, I was reacting to pressure to do
this, but I should probably have phrased this as a "should we do this"
rather than "I want to do this".
To be clear, I wasn't calling for a meeting. I was going to suggest it
could be a good topic to continue to discuss in email amongst those with a
vested interest. It could also be a topic for the IWG and some focused work
by concerned individuals could come back to the XWG as some
recommendations. With luck, anyway
Jim
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Coulter, Susan K <skc at lanl.gov> wrote:
>
> Please let’s not start a new thread.
> This is an important and valuable discussion - but we probably need to do
> this live.
>
> For now I would suggest the XWG meeting, as was done in an email I just
> sent.
> There are too many interested parties to take the offline, and I
> personally do not have enough cycles to carve out yet another weekly OFA
> meeting.
>
> > On Sep 1, 2017, at 11:06 AM, Jim Ryan <jimdryan at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > There has been a good deal of discussion on this since yesterday's Board
> meeting in two now lengthy threads "Logo Program Discussion" and "Jason's
> draft preso...". I'm getting some heated comments this has gone on too long
> and this isn't the right forum.
> >
> > Therefore I'm going to suggest starting a new thread including those
> who've spoken up or are known to have an interest in this area, including
> myself, Paul Bowden (chair of the IWG), Woody, Jason, Parks, Christoph and
> Susan. I'm trying to ID likely suspects who may wish to continue the
> discussion here or maybe at a IWG meeting or maybe even as a specific topic
> at a future XWG meeting.
> >
> > This isn't meant to be exclusive. If you're interested and your name
> isn't on the list, just tell me.
> >
> > BTW, I accept the criticism that this ran on too long here. I want to
> explain without being defensive I continued because:
> > - I learned a lot, so I presume others did as well
> >
> > - Sorry but there were some basic misunderstandings as I heard it
> >
> > - We were hearing from some who rarely comment, made easy because of
> this reflector
> >
> > - I had hopes we'd hear from still more, again, because of the
> convenience of the reflector
> >
> > In any case, thanks very much for this. I hope to gain further insights
> as this thread continues
> >
> > regards, Jim
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ofa_boardplus mailing list
> > Ofa_boardplus at lists.openfabrics.org
> > http://lists.openfabrics.org/mailman/listinfo/ofa_boardplus
>
> ==================================================
> Susan Coulter / HPC-DES
> Network Capability Lead
> (505) 667-8425
> “Once in a while you get shown the light
> In the strangest of places if you look at it right” Robert Hunter
> ==================================================
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/ofa_boardplus/attachments/20170901/91bd2b71/attachment.html>
More information about the Ofa_boardplus
mailing list