[Ofa_boardplus] New OpenFabricsSoftware webpage

[Woodruff, Robert J]

Please work with Arlin on that.

From: Coulter, Susan K [mailto:skc at lanl.gov]
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 2:14 PM
To: Woodruff, Robert J <robert.j.woodruff at intel.com>
Cc: Hal Rosenstock <hal at mellanox.com>; Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at ziepe.ca>; ofa_boardplus at lists.openfabrics.org, <ofa_boardplus at lists.openfabrics.org>
Subject: Re: [Ofa_boardplus] New OpenFabricsSoftware webpage




On Jun 4, 2018, at 2:50 PM, Woodruff, Robert J <robert.j.woodruff at intel.com<mailto:robert.j.woodruff at intel.com>> wrote:

Some of the repos on the OFA are still used by the EWG to create OFED. DAPL is mostly in maintenance mode and it would be easier to leave it where it is
since moving it would actually require more work. Also, I believe that vlad stages the kernel code in a git tree on the OFA server to allow adding the backports and
create the RPMs and various packages.

I agree that for old git trees that are now maintained elsewhere, we should remove those but not the ones that are still being actively used.

Can you provide a list of the repos still being used for OFED ?



From: Ofa_boardplus [mailto:ofa_boardplus-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org] On Behalf Of Coulter, Susan K
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 11:18 AM
To: Hal Rosenstock <hal at mellanox.com<mailto:hal at mellanox.com>>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at ziepe.ca<mailto:jgg at ziepe.ca>>; ofa_boardplus at lists.openfabrics.org<mailto:ofa_boardplus at lists.openfabrics.org>, <ofa_boardplus at lists.openfabrics.org<mailto:ofa_boardplus at lists.openfabrics.org>>
Subject: Re: [Ofa_boardplus] New OpenFabricsSoftware webpage


Wonderful.

Hal - Can you let me know when your repos have been moved ?

Arlin/Woody - Can you talk about how removing the OFA git site affects the EWG?
Removing it completely would be the optimal goal.
DAPL would have to go somewhere, and I’m not sure if the OFA bugzilla would be affected by this.




On Jun 4, 2018, at 11:39 AM, Hal Rosenstock <hal at mellanox.com<mailto:hal at mellanox.com>> wrote:

On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 05:36:07PM +0000, Coulter, Susan K wrote:


  Please see the attached preso.
  It is a list of the repos on the OFA git site.
  The top section are the only repos that look remotely valid.

~tnikolova/{libi40iw, libiwpm, libnes} and ~halr/libibumad are all
superseded by rdma-core.

mstflint is superseded by

https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgith
ub.com<http://ub.com>%2FMellanox%2Fmstflint&data=02%7C01%7Chal%40mellanox.com<http://40mellanox.com>%7
C0e1601ec12284bf4b83a08d5ca408abf%7Ca652971c7d2e4d9ba6a4d149256f4
61b%7C0%7C0%7C636637300927610895&sdata=gZd7Uy6b%2BeIM7jD%2FK9h
FCfyhl1wW9bJc9u8PPMd2R%2Bo%3D&reserved=0

Ignoring the clearly EWG/OFED stuff that leaves

~ardavis/dapl.git
~halr/ibsim.git
~halr/opensm.git

Hal: Do you think we should move ibsim and opensm to linux-rdma's github
project? Or someplace else?

I think that linux-rdma github is fine for these repos. ~hal/dump_pr.git should go there too.

-- Hal



No idea what to do with DAPL, if EWG starts a OFA github project then
maybe move it there?



  If we can ultimately move the valid bits to github - we can then
  discontinue a separate git site.

Strongly recommend EWG re-organize their process around github or
similar..

Jason

================================
Susan Coulter
LANL / USRC / HPC-DES
Network Lead
(505) 412-6525
Lokah Samastah Sukhino Bhavantu
================================

================================
Susan Coulter
LANL / USRC / HPC-DES
Network Lead
(505) 412-6525
Lokah Samastah Sukhino Bhavantu
================================

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/ofa_boardplus/attachments/20180604/c7a5343a/attachment.html>