[Ofa_boardplus] New OpenFabricsSoftware webpage

[Hal Rosenstock]

> You can upload the original old tar files to github and link them to their
> releases in github if this is a concern.

Do you think it's a legitimate concern ? Did it come up before with any of the repos that moved ?

What is the procedure to do this ?

Is OFA downloads going to remain or is that going away too ?

> On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 02:02:57PM +0000, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> >    Hi Susan,
> >
> >
> >    I’ve now moved my repos from OFA to github.
> >
> >
> >    One thing I do notice is that the tar balls and md5sums of the releases
> >    are different from the original releases in downloads on OFA git
> >    server. Don’t know if this is going to be an issue or not for anyone
> >    using an existing release. Does this matter ?
> >
> >
> >    I will make announcements on the moves shortly.
> >
> >
> >    n  Hal
> >
> >
> >    From: Coulter, Susan K [mailto:skc at lanl.gov]
> >    Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 2:18 PM
> >    To: Hal Rosenstock <hal at mellanox.com>
> >    Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at ziepe.ca>;
> >    ofa_boardplus at lists.openfabrics.org,
> >    <ofa_boardplus at lists.openfabrics.org>
> >    Subject: Re: [Ofa_boardplus] New OpenFabricsSoftware webpage
> >
> >
> >
> >    Wonderful.
> >
> >
> >    Hal - Can you let me know when your repos have been moved ?
> >
> >
> >    Arlin/Woody - Can you talk about how removing the OFA git site affects
> >    the EWG?
> >
> >    Removing it completely would be the optimal goal.
> >
> >    DAPL would have to go somewhere, and I’m not sure if the OFA bugzilla
> >    would be affected by this.
> >
> >
> >    On Jun 4, 2018, at 11:39 AM, Hal Rosenstock <[1]hal at mellanox.com>
> >    wrote:
> >
> >
> >      On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 05:36:07PM +0000, Coulter, Susan K wrote:
> >
> >        Please see the attached preso.
> >        It is a list of the repos on the OFA git site.
> >        The top section are the only repos that look remotely valid.
> >
> >      ~tnikolova/{libi40iw, libiwpm, libnes} and ~halr/libibumad are all
> >      superseded by rdma-core.
> >      mstflint is superseded by
> >
> [2]https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%
> >      2Fgith
> >
> ub.com%2FMellanox%2Fmstflint&data=02%7C01%7Chal%40mellanox.com%7
> >
> C0e1601ec12284bf4b83a08d5ca408abf%7Ca652971c7d2e4d9ba6a4d149256f4
> >
> 61b%7C0%7C0%7C636637300927610895&sdata=gZd7Uy6b%2BeIM7jD%2FK9h
> >      FCfyhl1wW9bJc9u8PPMd2R%2Bo%3D&reserved=0
> >      Ignoring the clearly EWG/OFED stuff that leaves
> >      ~ardavis/dapl.git
> >      ~halr/ibsim.git
> >      ~halr/opensm.git
> >      Hal: Do you think we should move ibsim and opensm to linux-rdma's
> >      github
> >      project? Or someplace else?
> >
> >    I think that linux-rdma github is fine for these repos.
> >    ~hal/dump_pr.git should go there too.
> >
> >      No idea what to do with DAPL, if EWG starts a OFA github project
> >      then
> >      maybe move it there?
> >
> >        If we can ultimately move the valid bits to github - we can then
> >        discontinue a separate git site.
> >
> >      Strongly recommend EWG re-organize their process around github or
> >      similar..
> >      Jason
> >
> >
> >    ================================
> >    Susan Coulter
> >    LANL / USRC / HPC-DES
> >    Network Lead
> >    (505) 412-6525
> >    Lokah Samastah Sukhino Bhavantu
> >    ================================
> >
> > References
> >
> >    1. mailto:hal at mellanox.com
> >    2.
> > https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https://gith