[ofiwg] post OFI 1.0

Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) jsquyres at cisco.com
Sat May 2 03:36:40 PDT 2015


On May 1, 2015, at 2:03 PM, Weiny, Ira <ira.weiny at intel.com> wrote:
> 
> If my vote counts for anything I vote to use the semantic versioning (3 numbers) and have the package number == the library *.so version.

Sorry, I (strongly) disagree with this idea.

GNU Libtool even (strongly) recommends against making the package version equal the .so version number (see https://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual/libtool.html#Versioning).

.so library versions have an inherently different purpose than the package version number (especially when there are multiple .so's in a package).

-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres at cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/




More information about the ofiwg mailing list