[ofiwg] libfabric dpa provider
p91paul at gmail.com
Fri Oct 2 11:43:27 PDT 2015
I know what you are talking about, and what copyleft means. For my
projects, I default to it, because I like what implies. As long as I don't
receive contributions, I can change any time.
As I told, my initial thought wasn't about integrating into libfabric, nor
I would have expected all of you to be so eager to integrate it. There
should be no problem with changing the license now, and I will discuss with
other interested parties.
Il 02/ott/2015 20:27, "Jeff Hammond" <jeff.science at gmail.com> ha scritto:
>> Il 02/10/2015 19:04, Woodruff, Robert J ha scritto:
>> I think he said LGPL not GPL, but the OFA prefers the dual BSD/GPL
>> I did say LGPL.
> LGPL solves the problem for the end user who is linking the DLL, but not
> the developer community, which is who you are trying to convey your code
> to. The source of your code is copyleft, which infects the minds of anyone
> that reads it. You probably think I am joking or exaggerating, but I am
> not. You should talk to lawyers at any company that sells software.
> Jeff Hammond
> jeff.science at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ofiwg