[ofiwg] getting hardware details from libfabric

[Hefty, Sean]

> Given that "protocol" and "transport" may be overloaded terms,
> should we use a field name like "network_type"?  That lets us
> identify Ethernet, IB, Omnipath, GNI, ... etc.  I think that's what
> we're trying to identify here, right?

Yes, I was trying to report Ethernet, IB (for actual IB link layer), OmniPath, etc.  I have no idea what Cray or BG/Q actually are.  Aries? BG/Q?  But that's a provider problem.  :)