[ofiwg] [libfabric-users] mmap'ed kernel memory in fi_mr_reg
Hefty, Sean
sean.hefty at intel.com
Fri Nov 16 08:35:38 PST 2018
> I am happy with this being a provider-specific extension for now. The
> project that requires this will anyway only use the verbs provider.
>
> I do not think there is a fully reliable way of distinguishing
> physical/virtual addresses. I spoke with our driver expert here who
> cannot think of a way either. The provider-specific flag seems to be
> the way to go, what do you think?
I agree this works fine.
The only alternative I can think of is to try a normal registration call, and if that fails, try again using the physical flag. Would this work, or does the normal registration call succeed, but produce an unusable MR?
- Sean
More information about the ofiwg
mailing list