[Openib-windows] RE: [patch] cl_signal_osd.h

[Yossi Leybovich]

What does cl_reg_sig_hdl map to for other platforms? 
[YL] We have implementation of this function in our Linux compilb for both
Windows and Linux, because our complib does not include any Linux
implementation I remove the code and left only direct call to signal .
But still to keep the same code base we need this function.

Why not just call signal directly?
[YL] as I explain in Linux complib we have other implementation.
We need it in order to keep the same code base

-----Original Message-----
From: Fab Tillier [mailto:ftillier at silverstorm.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 3:18 AM
To: 'Yossi Leybovich'
Cc: openib-windows at openib.org; Windows Group
Subject: RE: [patch] cl_signal_osd.h


> From: Yossi Leybovich [mailto:sleybo at mellanox.co.il]
> Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 4:08 AM
> 
> Attached patch file for cl_signal_osd.h (for registering to OSs 
> signals.) OpenSM need it. We would be happy if you review it, and then 
> CI this file to complib.

What does cl_reg_sig_hdl map to for other platforms?  Why not just call
signal directly?  Does it ever resolve to anything but signal or a __noop
macro?  As it stands, it doesn't seem like a very useful abstraction, as
cl_reg_sig_hdl has the same prototype as signal, and cl_sig_mask_sigint is a
no-op.

Thanks,

- Fab
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/ofw/attachments/20050712/455f5f30/attachment.html>