[Openib-windows] Two new bugs on our Bugzila system

[Erez Cohen]

Hi Fab,

Regarding the CQ size, we did implemented a patch to fix the resize CQ
but it seems that this patch is quite large and effects MTHCA stability.

At this point I would rather use a static or semi static (env variable)
size to not farther delay this release.

Please let me know if you  think this may be problematic. 


Best regards, 

Erez Cohen
Field Application and Support Engineer
Mellanox Technologies Ltd. 
Tel : + 972 - 4 - 9097200 ext 378
Cell : + 972 - 54 - 5468801
Fax : + 972 - 4 - 9593245
www.mellanox.com

-----Original Message-----
From: openib-windows-bounces at openib.org
[mailto:openib-windows-bounces at openib.org] On Behalf Of Fabian Tillier
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 11:05 AM
To: Tzachi Dar
Cc: openib-windows at openib.org
Subject: Re: [Openib-windows] Two new bugs on our Bugzila system

Hi Tzachi,

On 6/26/06, Tzachi Dar <tzachid at mellanox.co.il> wrote:
>
> http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=149 WSD: QP's are not 
> created on the correct size

Is there a way we could avoid all the resize CQ workaround stuff and add
resize CQ to MTHCA?  I won't be able to get to this until I get back,
however if you feel like putting a patch together that would be great.

> http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=148 WSD: When connecting to

> a remote host, with no socket listening, time out is returned

I'll take a look at the this when I'm back in the office.

Thanks,

- Fab

_______________________________________________
openib-windows mailing list
openib-windows at openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-windows