[Openib-windows] IBAL fixes for memfree driver

Fabian Tillier ftillier at silverstorm.com
Fri Mar 24 15:01:43 PST 2006


On 3/22/06, Fabian Tillier <ftillier at silverstorm.com> wrote:
> Hi Leonid,
>
> On 3/22/06, Leonid Keller <leonid at mellanox.co.il> wrote:
> > Hi Fab,
> > I've checked the error codes with FW guys and it turned that you were
> > right:
> > RDD/EEC codes are not in use now.
>
> Great!
>
> > So left are ony:
> >        IB_WCS_BAD_RESP_ERR,
> >        IB_WCS_LOCAL_ACCESS_ERR,
> >        IB_WCS_GENERAL_ERR
> >
> > Regarding IB_WCS_LOCAL_ACCESS_ERR:
> > According to IB spec, it must be two different syndroms, so the FW
> > returns them.
> > I don't think, that we need to "simplify" the spec for user, mapping
> > them to one error code:
> > If the he doesn't matter, he won't check it.
>
> I'll merge these in.  Note that the patch you attached still includes
> the QP number addition to the work completion structure.  I won't
> apply that change - it needs to be supressed internally to the MTHCA
> driver.

I merged the status codes in and committed the changes in revision 251.

Note that the last patch you sent was severely broken - it looks like
you manually deleted parts of the patch, but didn't update the diff
headers so that it would apply.  If you can, please test your patch
against the current tip of the OpenIB SVN to make sure it applies
cleanly.

Thanks,

- Fab



More information about the ofw mailing list