[ofw] udapl for windows
Tzachi Dar
tzachid at mellanox.co.il
Tue Dec 11 15:02:00 PST 2007
See bellow.
Thanks
Tzachi
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean Hefty [mailto:sean.hefty at intel.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 11:27 PM
> To: Tzachi Dar; Fab Tillier; Davis, Arlin R; Gabor Forgacs;
> ofw at lists.openfabrics.org
> Subject: RE: [ofw] udapl for windows
>
> >What is being done is that IPOIB looks at all the ARP replies and
> >updates it's tables accordingly. So, IPOIB does know where
> the remote
> >addresses are if windows knows them.
>
> This should work if ARP was actually used for the address
> translation. Does Windows support manual updates to the route tables?
Windows does support it manually, and I guess that if one will add an
ARP entry manually, than IPOIB won't work, and so all that depends on
it.
We never saw this problem in real life.
> >Please note that all the caching issues are minor to my
> understanding
> >as each component can hold it's own cache of the arp/ATS results and
> >get the results very quickly.
>
> This ends up implementing multiple caches, each with their
> own policy. IMO, it would be easier for a user to control
> caching policy in one place.
No arguing about it, simply we didn't find a documented way to get that
information.
One can continue the lookup.
> - Sean
>
More information about the ofw
mailing list