[openib-general] [ofw] [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re:winrelated[was:Re:[PATCH 1/2] opensm: sigusr1: syslog() fixes]]]

[Sasha Khapyorsky]

On 21:18 Sat 24 Mar     , Tzachi Dar wrote:
> After some more checks, and given the limited time that I had for this,
> I'm afraid that I wasn't able to find a way to do that. Do you have any
> idea of how this can be done?

I think that using one of the ready pthread for windows implementations
could be more optimal way.

However if you still prefer a "wrapper" solution I found this article,
this describes pthread_cond_wait() implementation issue, guess it is
potentially hardest part of such wrapper. Hope it is useful.

  http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/win32-cv-1.html

Sasha

> 
> Thanks
> Tzachi
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sasha Khapyorsky [mailto:sashak at voltaire.com] 
> > Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 3:42 PM
> > To: Tzachi Dar
> > Cc: Hal Rosenstock; ofw at lists.openfabrics.org; Gilad Shainer; 
> > OPENIB; Fab Tillier
> > Subject: Re: [openib-general] [ofw] [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: 
> > Re:winrelated[was:Re:[PATCH 1/2] opensm: sigusr1: syslog() fixes]]]
> > 
> > Hi Tzahi,
> > 
> > On 18:56 Wed 21 Feb     , Tzachi Dar wrote:
> > > 
> > > To be on the practical side, I have read the introduction 
> > to pthreads 
> > > in the past and from what I saw it was relatively easy to implement 
> > > that on Win32. I want to look at the functions that were mentioned 
> > > before in this thread and see if that is still the case.
> > > 
> > > Let me get back to you on this at the beginning of next week.
> > 
> > Any news here? Thanks.
> > 
> > Sasha
> >