[ofw] Svn functionality freeze - good news and not so good news

[Smith, Stan]

Anatoly Greenblatt wrote:
> Hello Stan,
>
> The revision 1499 includes all function you mentioned, however changes
> you made at rev 1504 do not include the code that existed in 1499. You
> have probably made your changes on older revision. The partition
> functionality is broken by changes you made.

Hello,
  Indeed I am at fault, the frustrations of a long day over flowed....that said.
There were no announcements w.r.t. to ibbus changes made @ svn.1499 that I saw on the list.
None the less, it does not excuse my oversight.

Stan.


>
> Regards,
> Anatoly.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ofw-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org
> [mailto:ofw-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org] On Behalf Of Smith, Stan
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 03:36
> To: ofw at lists.openfabrics.org
> Subject: [ofw] Svn functionality freeze - good news and not so good
> news
>
>
> The svn functionality freeze branch for WinOF 2.0 did not happen due
> to the following:
>
> Previous head of svn @ 1505 failed to build
>   1) missing routine bus_rem_pkey() referenced in
> core\al\kernel\al_proxy_ioc.c
>   2) unannounced typedef change in file inc\kernel\iba\ipoib_ifc.h
>        port_guid_pkey --> port_guid_pkey_t
>
>
> In svn.1506 I repaired bus_port_mgr.c for the typedef and hacked in a
> stub bus_rem_pkey() into bus_driver.c in order to build-n-test.
>
> Would whomever knows anything about 'bus_rem_pkey()' please add a real
> routine and remove my bus_driver.c build hack.
>
> When this is accomplished we can freeze WinOF 2.0 functionality by
> branching.
>
> Stan.
>
> _______________________________________________
> ofw mailing list
> ofw at lists.openfabrics.org
> http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ofw