***SPAM*** RE: [ofw] ipoib performance degradation between rev 1429 and 1430

[Anatoly Greenblatt]

Nope, no wsd installed/enabled.
 
My guess is - csum offloading is broken in mthca.
 
Anatoly.

________________________________

From: Smith, Stan [mailto:stan.smith at intel.com]
Sent: Tue 8/26/2008 8:10 PM
To: Anatoly Greenblatt; ofw at lists.openfabrics.org
Subject: RE: [ofw] ipoib performance degradation between rev 1429 and 1430


Is WSD enabled?
 
same behavior with WSD disabled?
 
Is WSD hotfix 938680 installed?
 
just some random thoughts.
 
stan.

________________________________

From: ofw-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org [mailto:ofw-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org] On Behalf Of Anatoly Greenblatt
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 9:54 AM
To: ofw at lists.openfabrics.org
Subject: [ofw] ***SPAM*** ipoib performance degradation between rev 1429 and 1430
Importance: High



Hi,

 

It affects only mthca driven hcas. The performance goes from this:

 <https://owa.voltaire.com/exchange/anatolyg/Drafts/RE:%20[ofw]%20%20ipoib%20performance%20degradation%20between%20rev%201429%20and%201430.EML/1_multipart/image001.jpg> 

 

to that:

 

 <https://owa.voltaire.com/exchange/anatolyg/Drafts/RE:%20[ofw]%20%20ipoib%20performance%20degradation%20between%20rev%201429%20and%201430.EML/1_multipart/image002.jpg> 

 

Regards,

Anatoly.

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/ofw/attachments/20080826/9e29d624/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 64474 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/ofw/attachments/20080826/9e29d624/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 70249 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/ofw/attachments/20080826/9e29d624/attachment-0001.jpg>