[ofw] [RFC] Locally generated path records
Sean Hefty
sean.hefty at intel.com
Mon Jul 21 13:49:24 PDT 2008
>Yeah, it's a shame the maintainers for OpenSM on Windows are MIA. It's
>probably been a year since Windows OpenSM has been synchronized with Linux
>OpenSM.
Once winmad and libibumad are working, it will hopefully be easier to keep the
windows and linux code bases in sync. The goal would be to keep a single code
repository for diags and opensm, rather than continually porting them into a
separate repository and having to maintain it.
>So the MC group static rate would be the floor for communication for anyone in
>the group then. That does what I need it to then.
You could probably read the port attributes to determine the rate. It may not
work on the far side, but I would think that you could discover that through the
CM protocol.
>So path records for UD and RC don't need to be reversible? Is zero thus a
>better hard coded value?
Well... you need someway for the remote side to send data back. Setting
reversible = 1 likely works in practice for most configurations. The CM
requires a reversible path for the CM messages.
I don't know of any apps that actually make use of non-reversible paths. Maybe
ipoib does?
- Sean
More information about the ofw
mailing list