[ofw] RE: OpenSM patches for saquery porting - 2 of 6 patches.

Smith, Stan stan.smith at intel.com
Mon Feb 2 10:02:22 PST 2009


Tzachi Dar wrote:
> Sean and Stan,
>
> Have you reached a conclusion of how to use getopt?

Sean is correct, the getopt patch needs to be cleaned up.
Will do so ASAP and resubmit a patch.

Stan.

>
> Can we commit the original patch?
>
> Thanks
> Tzachi
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ofw-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org
>> [mailto:ofw-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org] On Behalf Of Sean Hefty
>> Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 1:08 AM
>> To: Smith, Stan; Yevgeny Kliteynik
>> Cc: ofw at lists.openfabrics.org
>> Subject: [ofw] RE: OpenSM patches for saquery porting - 2 of 6
>> patches.
>>
>>> +
>>> +#ifndef _GETOPT_H_
>>> /* Global variables for getopt_long */  char *optarg; /*
>>> @@ -36,6 +38,7 @@
>>>   int *flag;
>>>   int val;
>>> };
>>> +#endif
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> /************************************************************
>>> ********** **/ @@ -43,11 +46,14 @@
>>> get_char_option(const char* optstring,
>>>                              char*const* argv,int argc,
>>>                              int iArg, int* opt_ind,char* opt_p); +
>>> int
>>> getopt_long_only(int argc, char *const*argv,
>>>                          const char *optstring,
>>>                          const struct option *longopts, int
>>> *longindex);
>>>
>> /*********************************************************************
>>> *****/
>>
>> The duplicate implementation of getopt should just be
>> removed, with the code using the common one provided by
>> etc\user\getopt.c and inc\user\getopt.h.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ofw mailing list
>> ofw at lists.openfabrics.org
>> http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ofw




More information about the ofw mailing list