[ofw] choice between IBAL and winverbs
Smith, Stan
stan.smith at intel.com
Tue Jul 21 10:22:23 PDT 2009
________________________________
From: ofw-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org [mailto:ofw-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org] On Behalf Of Prasanna Vv
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 10:16 AM
To: ofw at lists.openfabrics.org
Subject: Re: [ofw] choice between IBAL and winverbs
Thanks Stan.
For kernel mode IB interface, whether winverbs-driver IOCTL can be used or IBAL is the only choice?
Unfortunately I was not clear w.r.t. user-mode or kernel mode POV (Point-Of-View).
A kernel mode implementation of winverbs is not available today. The work is being discussed and will be available in the WinOF 2.2 release (late Q4'09/Q1'10).
Kernel mode winverbs will not be available in the upcoming WinOF 2.1 release.
stan.
Regards,
Prasanna
Smith, Stan wrote:
Prasanna Vv wrote:
Hello All,
In WINOF 2.1, most of the ULPs are based on Winverbs, while IPoIB
driver continues to use IBAL .
Actually most of the ULPs are based on IBAL for historical reasons.
It's only newer DAPL providers (Socket-CM & rdma-CM) plus OFED diags which are using OFED compatibility (aka libibverbs/winverbs).
NetworkDirect continues to use the IBAL IF although there is work-in-progress to switch over to winverbs to take advantage of overlapped I/O ops.
I wish to know if OFED will continue to support and enhance IBAL as
complimentary approach for Winverbs for IB verbs interface ? Or IBAL
may be phased out ?
The IBAL interface will be supported well into the future, measured in years.
Under the covers, how the IBAL interface is implemented may change such that an IBAL function could transparently become a wrapper for a call into winverbs.
The 'BIG" deal with IBAL is how it implements PNP and how IPoIB and drivers rely on this implementation.
There are no current plans to change all drivers and IPoIB to use Microsoft PNP and remove this functionality from IBAL; although it would be an excellent idea (very large task). For the PNP reasons, IBAL will stick around for some time.
For future development, I would recommend the OFED compatibility layer (libibverbs/winverbs).
Stan.
Thanks,
Prasanna
_______________________________________________
ofw mailing list
ofw at lists.openfabrics.org<mailto:ofw at lists.openfabrics.org>
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ofw
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/ofw/attachments/20090721/ae2e75db/attachment.html>
More information about the ofw
mailing list