[ofw] RE: IPoIB NDIS 6.0 - what is the proposed svn file structure?

[Smith, Stan]

Hi Alex,
  If you are going to change filenames, I would vote in favor of changing the NDIS 5.0 IPoIB filenames as NDIS 6.0 IPoIB is the future; netipoib.in{x/f} and ipoib.sys would be preferable for NDIS 6 versions.

If we do not change IPoIB filenames, then we have a build filename conflicts or need to modify build makefiles to exclude IPoIB build for specific Windows version (example, IPoIB NDIS 5 only for Svr 2003 & XP).

What direction do you suggest?

Stan.


Alex Naslednikov wrote:
> Hello,
> I work on NDIS 6.0
> I started the work directly on IPoIB_CM branch, so I propose to use
> only one branch, that will contain all of these above:
> {UD+CM} over NDIS 6.0
>
> XaleX
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Smith, Stan [mailto:stan.smith at intel.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 8:37 PM
> To: Tzachi Dar
> Cc: Leonid Keller; Alex Naslednikov; ofw at lists.openfabrics.org
> Subject: IPoIB NDIS 6.0 - what is the proposed svn file structure?
>
> Hello,
>   I'm not entirely clear as to who is working on NDIS 6.0 IPoIB, hence
> the broad addressing.
>
> What are you thoughts on how the SVN file system structure will look
> like once the following work is SVN committed:
>
> 1) NDIS 6.0 IPoIB code (Datagram mode)
> 2) NDIS 6.0 IPoIB CM (Connected Mode)
> 3) NDIS 5.2 IPoIB, I'm assuming there is no CM for NDIS 5.2?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stan.