[ofw] ib_portinfo_record_t padding history?
Sean Hefty
sean.hefty at intel.com
Wed May 19 08:33:35 PDT 2010
>> The padding looks wrong based on the IB spec. PortInfoRecord should have
>> PortInfo as its last field. The size of PortInfoRecord should be 58 bytes.
>
>I don't think that size for PortInfoRecord is correct as PortInfo is
>60 bytes with MaxCreditHint and LinkRtLatency.
The IB spec is wrong on table 194 (PortInfoRecord). The PortInfo Length that's
given is too small. I'll submit a bug against this.
- Sean
More information about the ofw
mailing list