[ofw] [Patch][IPoIB_NDIS6_CM] Fix at __ipoib_port_down()

[Smith, Stan]

Alex Naslednikov wrote:
> There is an old patch that probably was missed.
> Can I commit it while putting the function call after the variable
> declarations ?

Please do so.

thank you,

stan.

>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Smith, Stan [mailto:stan.smith at intel.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 7:16 PM
> To: Alex Naslednikov; ofw at lists.openfabrics.org
> Subject: RE: [ofw] [Patch][IPoIB_NDIS6_CM] Fix at __ipoib_port_down()
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ofw-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org
> [mailto:ofw-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org] On Behalf Of Alex
> Naslednikov Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2010 6:07 AM
> To: ofw at lists.openfabrics.org
> Subject: [ofw] [Patch][IPoIB_NDIS6_CM] Fix at __ipoib_port_down()
>
>>> We still have a difference between MLNX and OFW trunks.
>>> I continue to resend patches that were not applied for unknown
>>> reasons.
>
> This is a new (never seen before) patch.
>
> Why do you place the port_down() call before variable declarations?
> This is contrary to the ipoib coding style?