[ofw] IBAL CM ignores responder resources of the passive side
Hefty, Sean
sean.hefty at intel.com
Wed Jun 22 09:04:18 PDT 2011
without looking at more of the code, it looks like a bug
> __save_user_rep(
>
> IN
> cep_agent_t* const p_port_cep,
>
> IN
> kcep_t* const p_cep,
>
> IN const iba_cm_rep* const
> p_cm_rep,
>
> IN
> uint8_t
> rnr_nak_timeout )
>
> {
>
> AL_ENTER( AL_DBG_CM );
>
>
>
> p_cep->local_qpn = p_cm_rep->qpn;
>
> p_cep->rq_psn = p_cm_rep->starting_psn;
>
> p_cep->init_depth = p_cm_rep->init_depth;
>
>
>
I think we can just always do the assignment:
p_cep->resp_res = p_cm_rep->resp_res;
here. Is the p_cep->resp_res the value that actually goes into the REP?
> ci_ca_lock_attr( p_port_cep->h_ca->obj.p_ci_ca );
>
> /* Check the CA's responder resource max and trim if
> necessary. */
>
> if( p_port_cep->h_ca->obj.p_ci_ca->p_pnp_attr-
> >max_qp_resp_res <
whine: The max_qp_resp_res isn't going to dynamically change. We should use a saved value somewhere that doesn't require serializing all CM users for this check.
- Sean
More information about the ofw
mailing list