[openib-general] Re: ibv_get_async_event

[Roland Dreier]

    Sean> After looking at the uCM more, changing from it's current
    Sean> model of put_event to ack_events would require changes to
    Sean> the get_event, which requires changes to the ib_cm_event
    Sean> structure.  I think that having matching event models across
    Sean> IB interfaces is ideal, but it requires re-working a fair
    Sean> portion of the uCM event processing.  How important do
    Sean> others feel that this is?

I don't think it's important to be able to ack multiple events.  I
only did it because there's only one type of CQ completion event.  For
async events, libibverbs only allows a single event to be acked at a
time.  So I think libibcm is fine the way it is.

 - R.