[openib-general] Please give 1.0 RC1 a whirl

[James Lentini]

On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Hal Rosenstock wrote:

> On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 20:56, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 17:45 -0800, Sean Hefty wrote:
> > > Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
> > > >         libibat
> > > >         libibat-debuginfo
> > > >         libibat-devel
> > > >         libibat-utils
> > > 
> > > The kernel modules to support these are obsolete.  We should 
> > > remove them from the release.
> > 
> > Fine by me :-)  Are we killing off the kernel code, too, in 
> > parallel?
> 
> I'm still waiting to hear all consumers have moved to addr/CMA.

The kDAPL OpenIB provider still uses IBAT. 

I'd like to see a copy of this code available from OpenIB, but it does 
not have to be on the trunk. For my purposes a copy in 

https://openib.org/svn/gen2/branches/shaharf-ibat 

would be acceptable. Any chance that this branch's at.c and at_priv.h 
could be updated to match the versions on the trunk? 

I don't know the state of the shaharf-ibat branch. If the current IBAT 
code wouldn't be consistent with that branch, I don't mind keeping the 
current IBAT code at 

https://openib.org/svn/gen2/users/jlentini/ibat