[ofa-general] [PATCH][RFC] Handle packet received on RQ of tx_qp with NOSRQ

[Pradeep Satyanarayana]

Roland Dreier wrote:
>  > I am implementing this only for completeness sake and want to do it with minimal 
>  > effort. Given the above, do you still see it necessary to use NAPI?
> 
>  > Is it acceptable that I roll up the previous NOSRQ patches (other than this one) into 
>  > a single patch and can that one be integrated first?
> 
> Given that you don't want to actually have something that really
> works, I guess there's no point in doing it at all.  Since there are
> no other IPoIB CM implementations out there yet, maybe it's acceptable
> to say that we don't implement a fully RFC-compliant version of the
> protocol.
> 

I believe you may have misinterpreted. If the existing handlers cannot be reused,
then I have reservations about having to come up with a complete parallel 
implementation that will deal with all the issues covered previously -memory usage,
falling back to UD mode and the like for what I believe will be seldom used.

I therefore want to come up with a "minimal" implementation that will be
RFC compliant.

Pradeep