[ofa-general] [PATCH][RFC] Handle packet received on RQ of tx_qp with NOSRQ
pradeeps at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Wed Aug 15 07:15:12 PDT 2007
Roland Dreier wrote:
> > I am implementing this only for completeness sake and want to do it with minimal
> > effort. Given the above, do you still see it necessary to use NAPI?
> > Is it acceptable that I roll up the previous NOSRQ patches (other than this one) into
> > a single patch and can that one be integrated first?
> Given that you don't want to actually have something that really
> works, I guess there's no point in doing it at all. Since there are
> no other IPoIB CM implementations out there yet, maybe it's acceptable
> to say that we don't implement a fully RFC-compliant version of the
I believe you may have misinterpreted. If the existing handlers cannot be reused,
then I have reservations about having to come up with a complete parallel
implementation that will deal with all the issues covered previously -memory usage,
falling back to UD mode and the like for what I believe will be seldom used.
I therefore want to come up with a "minimal" implementation that will be
More information about the general