[ofa-general] Re: 1.5 roadmap

[Woodruff, Robert J]

Or wrote,

>Woody,

>Except for one or two exceptions which I'm not sure about for the most
>case, we aren't talking on inclusion of code which is queued for merge
>vs already merged but rather on massive inclusion of non reviewed
>code.

>Or.

Yes,
I think we all agree on this, that we do not want to put large
blocks of non-reviewed code into OFED. 
My point was that I think that Mellanox has the goal to get
the reviews done before it is accepted into OFED 1.5,
but Tziporet can confirm this when she returns from vacation. 

woody