[ofa-general] ***SPAM*** opensm send_trap144 question

[Sasha Khapyorsky]

On 13:50 Wed 04 Mar     , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> > clear) the resp_expected flag. It seems to me that a more robust
> > strategy would be to set resp_expected to try to make sure that the
> > other side sees the trap
> 
> by handling the (trap repress) response matched by transaction ID
> 
> > (and the timeout/retry strategy is used)
> 
> if the trap repress is not received
> 
> > There are a number of underpinnings to change to do this. Would you
> > accept a patch along those lines ?

It could be done this way if it is a right thing to do.

Sasha